Buhari: Why I cannot assent to Electoral Act Amendment Bill

Buhari: Why I cannot assent to Electoral Act Amendment Bill

Tuesday, December 21, 2021 9:41 am

Muhammadu Buhari:

Muhammadu Buhari:

The news that President Muhammadu Buhari has withheld his assent to the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2021 in line with the provisions of Section 58(1) & (4) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) has been greeted with outrage, especially among the civil society organisations and the opposition Peoples Democratic Party, PDP.

However, the President was explicit on his reasons for refusing to sign the bill in his letter to the National Assembly. The President anchored his refusal on the inclusion of direct primaries as the only mode of election of candidates by the political parties in the Bill.

In the letter titled: “Withholding of Assent to Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2021,” the President said he decided to reject Bill based informed advice he received from relevant Ministries, Departments and Agencies of the government, and have also carefully reviewed the bill in light of the current realities prevalent in the Federal Republic of Nigeria in the circumstances.

The President said the preponderance of the advice he received was that he should reject the Bill.

In rejecting the Bill, said political parties should be allowed to choose either direct or indirect primaries to adopt in the conduct of their primary elections as their respective realities might permit.

But the President also pointed out that direct primary will not be the philosopher’s stone for the transformation of Nigeria’s electoral process contrary to the argument of its supporters. He also added that the cost of conducting direct primary will be costly with security implications.

The President said: “The Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2021, seeks to amend certain provisions of the extant Electoral Act 2010. Part of the objective of the Bill is the amendment of the present Section 87 of the Electoral Act, 2010 to delete the provision for the conduct of indirect primaries in the nomination of party candidates such that party candidates can henceforth only emerge through direct primaries.

“The conduct of direct primaries across the 8,809 wards across the length and breadth of the country will lead to a significant spike in the cost of conducting primary elections by parties as well as increase in the cost of monitoring such elections by INEC, who has to deploy monitors across these wards each time a party is to conduct direct primaries for the presidential, gubernatorial and legislative posts.

“The addition of these costs with the already huge cost of conducting general elections will inevitably lead to huge financial burden on both the political parties, INEC and the economy in general at a time of dwindling revenues.”

He also added that contrary to arguments of its supporters, direct primary will encourage monetisation and would constitute further strain on the economy.

The President added that smaller parties may not be able to muster resources required to mobilise all party members for the primaries.

“In addition to increased costs identified above, conducting and monitoring primary elections across 8,809 wards will pose huge security challenges as the security agencies will also be overstretched, direct primaries will be open to participation from all and sundry and such large turn-out without effective security coordination will also engender intimidation and disruptions, thereby raising credibility issues for the outcomes of such elections.

“The amendment as proposed is a violation of the underlying spirit of democracy, which is characterised by freedom of choices. Political party membership is a voluntary exercise of the constitutional right to freedom of association. Several millions of Nigerians are not card-carrying members of any political party.

“Thus, the emphasis should be on enabling qualified Nigerians to vote for the candidate of their choice during general election as a means of participation in governance and furtherance of the concept of universal adult suffrage or universal franchise.”

The President added that signing the Bill into law may lead to plethora of litigations based on diverse grounds and issues of law including but not limited to the fact that the proposed amendment cannot work in retrospect given that the existing constitution of the parties already registered with the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), permits direct, indirect and consensus primaries.

“This real possibility, will, without doubt, truncate the electoral programme of the nation as another electoral exercise is imminent towards a change of Government in 2023. Nigeria is at the moment still grappling with the issues of monetisation of the political process and vote buying at both party and general election.

“The direct implication of institutionalising only direct primaries is the aggravation of over[1]monetisation of the process as there will be much more people a contestant needs to reach out to thereby further fuelling corruption and abuse of office by incumbent contestants,who may resort to public resources to satisfy the increased demands and logistics of winning party primaries,” he argued.

He added that direct primaries would be subjected or susceptible to manipulation or malpractices as most parties cannot boast of reliable and verified membership register or valid means of identification.

He said this means non-members could be recruited to vote by wealthy contestants to influence the outcome.

“Rival parties can also conspire and mobilise people to vote against a good or popular candidate in a party during its primaries just to pave way for their own candidates. Whereas where voting is done by accredited delegates during indirect primaries, the above irregularities are not possible.

“The major conclusions arrived at upon the review are highlighted hereunder, to wit: Asides its serious adverse legal, financial, economic and security consequences, the limitation or restriction of the nomination procedures available to political parties and their members constitutes an affront to the right to freedom of association.

“It is thus undemocratic to restrict the procedure or means of nomination of candidates by political parties, as it also amounts to undue interference in the affairs of political parties.

“Indirect primaries or collegiate elections are part of internationally accepted electoral practices. More so, direct primaries are not free from manipulations and do not particularly guarantee the emergence of the will of the people especially, in circumstances like ours,where it is near impossible to sustain a workable implementation framework or structure thereof.

“In the premise of the above, I hereby signify to the National Assembly that I am constrained to withhold assent to the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2021 in line with the provisions of Section 58(1) & (4) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

“It is my considered position that the political parties should be allowed to freely exercise right of choice in deciding which of direct or indirect primaries to adopt in the conduct of their primary elections as their respective realities may permit. Please accept, the assurance of my highest consideration and esteem,” Buhari said.

Join The Conversation

One Comment

  • Abayomi Bada says:

    The reasons advanced for withholding his assent to the electoral bill by the President is in line with principles of democracy that is basically founded on freedom of choice by the parties. One choice could just have been dictatorial. Moreover the parties should be at liberty to decide amongst the available alternatives . The choices are either direct , indirect or by consensus by the parties, shikenan.

  • What do you think?

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.