More than 150,000 Americans want Republican senators charged with treason

More than 150,000 Americans want Republican senators charged with treason

Wednesday, March 11, 2015 7:54 pm


More than 155,000 people by Wednesday had signed a petition to the White House urging charges be filed against 47 Republican senators who they say committed “treasonous” offences by writing Iran’s leaders about ongoing nuclear negotiations.

Lawmakers caused a political furore with their controversial letter Monday that warned an international nuclear deal with Iran could be scrapped by the next US president, particularly if Congress does not give its seal of approval.

Obama: petitioners want White House file treason charges against Republican Senators

Obama: petitioners want White House file treason charges against Republican Senators

The White House has said it responds to such petitions when they reach the 100,000-signature threshold, providing President Barack Obama’s administration with another opportunity to slam a letter that it considers inflammatory.

According to the petition, the 47 senators “committed a treasonous offence when they decided to violate the Logan Act, a 1799 law which forbids unauthorised citizens from negotiating with foreign governments.”

Critics argue that the lawmakers, including at least three potential Republican 2016 presidential candidates, broke the law, or at least violated the traditions of Congress, by directly engaging a foreign power on US foreign policy.

Obama and Vice President Joe Biden pilloried the letter, as did several Democratic congressional leaders. Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif called it “unprecedented and undiplomatic.”

With no one indicted under the Logan Act since 1803, and zero successful prosecutions under that law, it is highly unlikely the 47 lawmakers — who include top Senate Republican leaders — are going to prison.

But the petition does help highlight the intensely divisive nature of the letter, which some in the Republican Party have acknowledged was not the ideal strategy for confronting Iran.

Negotiations with the Islamic republic “are tough enough here and I didn’t think it was appropriate to add another element that makes it more difficult,” Senate Republican Jeff Flake told National Public Radio on Tuesday.

Flake is one of seven Republicans who declined to sign on, including Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Bob Corker.

The letter could jeopardise the fragile bipartisan coalition of senators seeking to pass two crucial bills on Iran: one that would tighten sanctions on the regime in the event a nuclear deal falls apart, and another that would require congressional approval of any agreement with Tehran.

“My goal is to get 67 or more people on something that will affect the outcome,” Corker said, referring to the two-thirds Senate majority needed to overcome a presidential veto.


Join The Conversation

3 Comments

  • I just keep spamming the boards trying to get like-minded dolts to give me a ‘like’!

  • Mike Thack says:

    Contrary to popular understanding, the recall of members of the U.S. Congress has never been permissible according to the Constitution, and no member of the Congress has ever been removed by such means. That’s because the U.S. Constitution sets the qualifications and terms for being a member of the House or Senate; changing those qualifications or terms (as in making them subject to a recall) is unconstitutional and would require a constitutional amendment.This is only an educational argument of fact… it is not ideological or intended to argue the emotional underpinnings of your thesis.At the Constitutional Convention, the Framers considered and rejected a national recall provision. However, the Framers did not provide a way to remove bad legislators. The Constitution contains an expulsion clause for members of Congress, though it has widely been neglected since the Civil War cases of disloyalty. The most effective means of removal is still election: if a member of Congress does not do their work well, then don’t return them to office.The very first step you should take is to WRITE a HAND WRITTEN letter (yes, use a real pen not your computer or typewriter) to your representatives expressing your outrage. Remember to respect the office (even though you may hold the individual in contempt) and keep your language civil. It is best to be concise, make your point(s) and avoid long-winded exposition (after all you do want your letter to actually be read).Then expand your outreach… follow up with outreach to your local (precinct and/or county) party headquarters with both a phone call and a copy of the letter(s) you have sent your representatives. Network with like minds… take action… get involved. If everyone that is outraged does this it becomes an unstoppable movement.I can only show you the path… you must walk the walk… you must take action… Without you there is no democracy!

  • Chas Holman says:

    ‘United States Senators say, US not to be Trusted with word’ .. These are the Generic overseas headlines being ran right now.. So heartbreaking,.. What in Heavens name were they thinking?

    Why are the American people allowing these 47 Senators even one more second in United States office? They should be recalled and have new elections on each of their seats. To write a letter to another country to warn them that dealing with the executive office of the US is not in their best interests, is complete and utter treason. What the heck were they thinking? they have demonstrated they are INCAPABLE for their seats. Dangerous too.

    I’ve never been so angry politically in my life. This one really takes the cake. I now fear it IS possible for them to go even lower. This is dangerous nonsense and only appeals to those who desire sedition and anarchy.

  • What do you think?

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.