Friday, June 12, 2026 · Lagos

The NEWS

NIGERIA’S NEWSMAGAZINE SINCE 1993

The NEWS Magazine — the insight that shapes Nigeria.SUBSCRIBE ₦1,000/MO

Wadada Admits Probe Not Concluded After Struggling to Defend Phantom ₦210tn Claim on Channels TV Live Show

Enjoying this story? Read the full magazine — archive back to 1993.
Senator Aliyu Wadada
Senator Aliyu Wadada

 

By Yinka Ajimajasan

Chairman of the Senate Public Accounts Committee, Senator Aliyu Wadada, acknowledged that the Senate’s investigation into the alleged ₦210 trillion discrepancy in the accounts of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) is still ongoing after struggling to firmly defend the claim during a live appearance on Sunday Politics, a Channels Television programme hosted by Seun Okinbaloye.

The senator had previously suggested that about ₦210 trillion was unaccounted for in the national oil company’s books, a claim that has generated widespread debate among policy analysts and industry observers.

During the interview, Wadada insisted that the Senate committee relied on figures extracted from NNPCL’s audited financial statements covering the period between 2017 and 2023. However, he repeatedly clarified that the committee was still seeking explanations from the company regarding the entries contained in the records.

The programme host pressed the lawmaker on the credibility of the figure, questioning whether the claim was consistent with Nigeria’s fiscal realities.

At one point, Okinbaloye asked how a discrepancy of ₦210 trillion could exist when Nigeria’s entire federal budgets within the same period were only a fraction of that amount. He also queried whether the figure might represent cumulative accounting entries rather than actual missing funds.

Wadada struggled to provide a definitive explanation, repeatedly stating that the numbers were drawn from the company’s financial statements and that the committee’s role was to request clarifications from NNPCL.

In another exchange, the Channels Television anchor asked whether the committee had established that the funds were truly “missing” or whether the figures represented accounting classifications such as receivables, liabilities or other multi-year financial entries.

Okinbaloye further raised concerns that presenting such figures publicly without a complete forensic breakdown could create the misleading impression that trillions of naira had been diverted.

Responding, Wadada acknowledged that the investigation was still in progress and that the committee had invited officials of the national oil company to appear before it to explain the entries contained in the audited accounts.

Despite the senator’s clarification, analysts say the explanation leaves major questions unanswered about the scale and plausibility of the claim.

Oil and gas industry professional Dr. Kenneth Imeobi described the allegation as economically unrealistic, arguing that the figure collapses under basic scrutiny of Nigeria’s fiscal structure and oil sector revenue flows.

According to him, the scale of the alleged discrepancy far exceeds the country’s fiscal capacity during the period under review.

“Between 2017 and 2020, Nigeria’s entire federal budget ranged between roughly ₦7 trillion and ₦10 trillion annually, only rising significantly in recent years,” he said.

“To suggest that a single government company misplaced ₦210 trillion implies financial flows that are several multiples of Nigeria’s total national budget across many years.”

Imeobi added that such a scenario would require the national oil company to generate and lose funds exceeding the fiscal capacity of the Nigerian state itself.

He also dismissed suggestions that NNPC Upstream Investment Management Services (NUIMS) could independently disburse funds on such a scale.

“These operations are governed by joint venture partner approvals, corporate governance processes, annual work programme authorisations and regulatory oversight. There is simply no operational pathway through which funds on the scale being alleged could be disbursed outside those controls,” he said.

Chartered accountant and financial analyst Ezikiel Akande said the controversy appears to stem from a misunderstanding of how financial reporting works in the oil and gas sector.

According to him, financial statements in the industry often contain large cumulative entries reflecting capital expenditure programmes, joint venture cash calls, legacy liabilities and reconciliation of long-term commitments.

“When such figures are aggregated across several fiscal cycles, they can appear enormous if not properly interpreted,” he said.

Akande warned that presenting aggregated accounting figures as unexplained or missing funds without detailed forensic analysis risks creating a misleading narrative.

“Taking cumulative financial entries and presenting them as newly discovered missing funds is not sound financial analysis. It simply reflects a misreading of complex financial statements,” he said.

Analysts say the episode highlights the risks of drawing sweeping conclusions from complex financial records before a full technical review is completed, warning that exaggerated figures circulating in the public space could distort public perception and undermine investor confidence in Nigeria’s oil sector.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.