Court urged to commit to prison MDs of some commercial banks for contempt

Court urged to commit to prison MDs of some commercial banks for contempt

Monday, May 19, 2025 3:55 pm


Federal High Court in Lagos 

Federal High Court in Lagos

Akin Kuponiyi

A Limited liability company, Pro International Concept, has filed an application before a Federal High Court in Lagos  seeking the following order of the court:

An order committing MR BABATUNDE OLOFIN Managing Director, Moniepoint Microfinance Bank, MR MUSTY MUSTAPHA, Managing Director Kuda Microfinance Bank, MR HENRY OBIEKEA, Managing Director Fairmoney Microfinance Bank,MR CHIKA NWOSU Managing Director Palmpay Limited, and MR DAUDU   GOTRING WURITKA, Managing Director Opay Digital Service Limited for contempt of Court for their wilful disobedience to the Ex-Orders of the Honourable Court made on the 21st November, 2025.

An order directing the aforesaid persons to appear before this Honourable court to show cause why they should not be committed to prison instanter for their wilful acts of disobedience to the aforesaid.

Orders of the court

An order committing the aforesaid Persons to prison instanter for  wilful disobedience of the aforesaid Orders of this Honourable Court

And such further or other orders as the Honourable Court may deem fit, to make in the circumstances.

According to an affidavit in support of committal sworn to by a litigation manager, Omotayo Adebayo, in the Law firm of Bayo Omotubora and filed before the court on behalf of the company by a Lagos lawyer Prince Bayo Omotubora, the deponent avers that the company kept a current operational account with a commercial bank.

As part of the opening of the account, the email address submitted with other requirements was: [email protected], but upon completion of the account opening procedure, the email address was wrongly documented by the bank as; [email protected]. The last letter “h” was wrongly written as letter “n”.

The company repeatedly requested that the e-mail address be corrected, but the bank did not oblige and as a result of this the company decided to leave the e-mail address and it used it to receive messages.  The e-mail address was used to hack the company account

‘The Appitcant’s aforesaid account was hacked on the 5th of September, 2024, and a whopping sum of N95,000 O00 (Ninety-five Million Naira) was fraudulently taken out of the account and transferred in various sums in tranches into accounts domiciled in nine banks.

Immediately, the account of the company was hacked on the said 5th day of September, 2024, and the said sum of N95 Million was moved out of the account, the Applicant quickly alerted the account officer, who immediately sent out “Block and Recall of Fraudulent Transactions IFO PRO

International concept messages to the various fraud desks of the 28 financial institutions listed before the court as respondents.

The fraud desks of the respondents promised to freeze the suspected accounts of the  Respondents for 72 hours and required a court order to sustain the freeze beyond 72 hours.

The company sought and obtained a Court Order from a District Court sitting at Ngararaba Gurku, Nasarawa State on the 9th September, 2024 to enable the Respondents to hold on to the frozen funds beyond the 72 hours administratively as promised and the Order was served on the Respondents.

The company later instituted this suit in the court and on the 21st  November, 2024 the court graciously granted  orders directing that the salvaged sums in the various accounts of the  “Respondents be reversed to the company’s account and the multiple accounts of the respondents lined for further investigations, and the Court’s Orders and all the originating processes and Motion on Notice were duly served on the Respondents by the the balliff of the  Court.”

However, the directing minds of their organisations refused to reverse the company’s money frozen in their banks.

The company no longer has other options than to seek compliance with the committed proceedings herein initiated. The company filed FORM 48 and caused the same to be served on the Respondents, and notwithstanding the service, the said respondents did not respond.

Pro International Concept said it is interest of justice “to accede to this application.”

 


Join The Conversation

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.