Court orders Okonjo-Iweala account for missing N30trillion

Court orders Okonjo-Iweala account for missing N30trillion

Sunday, May 22, 2016 7:55 am


“It is also necessary to refer to sections 97 and 99 of the Sheriff and Civil Process Act. The provisions apply to the validity of the service and have nothing to do with the validity of the originating process. On the strength of this clear provision, which Mrs Okonjo-Iweala and the Federal Government did not deny and incapable of denying at this point, their objection is dismissed as the validity of the process is not affected in any way.”

“The main issue in this Court’s view bothers on the legal binding obligation imposed on Mrs Okonjo-Iweala and the Federal Government by the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act access to a record of information requested for. In the case at hand, SERAP through its letter of 2 February 2015, Exhibit A, sought the information relating to the spending of the alleged missing N30 trillion, which represents some accruable income to the Federal Government during the last 4 years of the Administration of President Goodluck Jonathan. Exhibit A has been received by them, and Exhibit B is the acknowledgement of receipt of Exhibit A.”

“However Mrs Okonjo-Iweala and the Federal Government have since the receipt of the request letter failed, refused and or neglected to provide SERAP with the information it requested for within their custody. They should have either supplied the information requested by SERAP or communicate their denial within 7 days of receipt of the application from SERAP if it considers that the application should be denied.”

It would be recalled that SERAP in February 2015 dragged Mrs Okonjo-Iweala to court over “failure to provide information about spending of the alleged missing N30tn, which represents some accruable income to the Federal Government in the past four years.”

SERAP executive director Adetokunbo Mumuni said: “This judgment shows the important role that Nigerian courts can play in the efforts to promote transparency in government and combat corruption and the impunity of perpetrators. It also confirms that high-ranking government officials can no longer escape accountability for their action while in office. We urge Mrs Okonjo-Iweala to cooperate with the authorities in the efforts to ensure the full and effective enforcement of the judgment.”

Mr Soludo had earlier reportedly asked Mrs Okonjo-Iweala: “How many trillions of naira were paid for oil subsidy (unappropriated?) How many trillions (in actual fact) have been ‘lost’ through Customs duty waivers over the last four years? Can you tell Nigerians why the price of diesel has still not come down despite the crash in global crude oil prices, and how much is being appropriated by friends in the process?”


Join The Conversation

6 Comments

  • Kemisola Robert says:

    I wonder what kind of judgments is passed these days. How can you expect her to be accounting for all those funds again. What of the 100 pages document she sent to SERAP the other day? What of the record documented and kept in the administration? This is an attempt to waste Dr Iweala’s time and it is highly unfair.

  • Salome Mohammed says:

    Soludo’s attempt to be named Minister of Finance in the Buhari-administration led SERAP on a wild goose chase, and foolhardy then ran after it. How confused can they be. Courts to pronounce orders via press release by the way.

  • Rowland Williams says:

    SERAP is of no good to the Nigerian soil. SERAP or what do they call themselves, they are nothing but INSTRUMENTS OF OPPRESSION and AGENTS of corruption fostering inhumanity on their subject of oppression.

  • Femi Hassan says:

    This is just an obvious case of corruption fighting back. And SERAP is the willing pawn being paid by the cabal that Dr Iweala fought to a standstill. Sad for the country.

  • Olusola Daniel says:

    It’s clear that Madam Okonjo-Iweala has stepped on many toes in the course of ensuring transparency and accountability in a very corrupt environment. Like every other attempt that has been made before now, this too will soon be revealed for the vacuous allegation that it is.

  • Wordchamp says:

    It’s unfortunate that any court would accord importance to such a baseless suit as this. It shows how far our judicial system is from where it ought to be.

  • What do you think?

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.