#Ebolavirus developed by US Bio-warfare lab, says US don

#Ebolavirus developed by US Bio-warfare lab, says US don

Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:44 pm


Ebola Virus: bio-warfare?

Ebola Virus: bio-warfare?

Could Ebola Have Escaped From US Bio-warfare Labs? American law professor, Francis A. Boyle, answers questions for tvxs.gr and reveals that USA have been using West Africa as an offshore to circumvent the Convention on Biological Weapons and do bio-warfare work.

Boyle is a leading American professor, practitioner and advocate of international law. He was responsible for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, the American implementing legislation for the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention.

He served on the Board of Directors of Amnesty International (1988-1992), and represented Bosnia – Herzegovina at the World Court. Professor Boyle teaches international law at the University of Illinois, Champaign. He holds a Doctor of Law Magna Cum Laude as well as a Ph.D. in Political Science, both from Harvard University.

He is also the author of “Biowarfare and Terrorism”. The book outlines how and why the United States government initiated, sustained and then dramatically expanded an illegal biological arms buildup.

He was interviewed by Aggeliki Dimopoulou

Q: Is Ebola just a result of health crisis in Africa – because of the large gaps in personnel, equipment and medicines – as some experts suggest?

That isn’t true at all. This is just propaganda being put out by everyone. It seems to me, that what we are dealing with here is a biological warfare work that was conducted at the bio-warfare laboratories set up by the USA on the west coast of Africa. And if you look at a map produced by the Center of Disease Control you can see where these laboratories are located. And they are across the heart of Ebola epidemic, at the west coast of Africa. So, I think these laboratories, one or more of them, are the origins of the Ebola epidemic.

US government agencies are supposed to do defensive biological warfare research in these labs. Is there any information about what are they working on?

Well, that’s what they tell you. But if you study what the CDC and the Pentagon do… They say it is defensive, but this is just for public relation purposes than anything. It’s a trick. What it means is what they decide at these bio-warfare labs. They say, “well we have to develop a vaccine”, so that’s their defensive argument. Then what they do is to develop the bio-warfare agent itself. Usually by means of DNA genetic engineering. And then they say, “well to get the vaccine we have to develop the bio-warfare agent” – usually by DNA genetic engineering – and then they try to work on the vaccine. So it’s two uses type of work. I haven’t read all these bio-warfare contracts but that’s typical of the way the Pentagon CDC has been doing this since at least the 1980’s. I have absolute proof from a Pentagon document that the Center of Disease Control was doing bio-warfare work for the Pentagon in Sierra Leone, the heart of the outbreak, as early as 1988. And indeed it was probably before then because they would have had to construct the lab and that would have taken some time. So we know that Fort Detrick and the Center for Disease Control are over there, Tulane University, which is a well-known bio-warfare center here in USA – I would say notorious for it – is there. They all have been over there.

In addition, USA government made sure that Liberia, a former colony of the USA, never became a party to the Biological Weapons Convention, so they were able to do bio – warfare work over there – going back to 1980’s – the USA government, in order to circumvent the Biological Weapons Convention. Likewise, Guinea the third state affected here – and there is an increase now – didn’t even sign the Biological Weapons Convention. So, it seems to me, that the different agencies of the US government have been always there try to circumvent the Biological Weapons Convention and engage bio-warfare work. Indeed, we had one of these two lab bio-warriors admit in the NY Times that they were not over there for the purpose of either screening or treating people. That’s not what these labs are about. These labs are there in my opinion to do bio-warfare work for different agencies of the US government. Indeed, many of them were set up by USAID. And everyone knows that USAID is penetrated all up and down by the CIA and CIA has been involved in bio-warfare work as well.

Professor Francis A Boyle: blows the whistle

Professor Francis A Boyle: blows the whistle

Are we being told the truth about Ebola? Is that big outbreak began all of a sudden? How does it spread so quickly?

The whole outbreak that we see in the west coast of Africa, this is Zaire/Ebola. The most dangerous of five subtypes of Ebola. Zaire/Ebola originated 3500 km from the west coast of Africa. There is absolutely no way that it could have been transmitted 3500 km. And if you read the recently published Harvard study on the DNA analysis of the west Africas’ Zaire/Ebola there is no explanation about how the virus moved there. And indeed, it’s been reported in the NY Times that the Zaire/Ebola was found there in 1976, and then WHO ordered to be set to Porton Down in Britain, which is the British equivalent to Fort Detrick, where they manufacture all the biological weapons for Britain. And then Britain sent it to the US Center for Disease Control. And we know for a fact that the Center for Disease Control has been involved in biological warfare work. And then it appears, at least from whatever I’ve been able to put together in a public record, that the CDC and several others US bio-warriors exported Zaire/Ebola to west Africa, to their labs there, where they were doing bio-warfare work on it. So, I believe this is the origins of the Zaire/Ebola pandemic we are seeing now in west Africa.


Join The Conversation

4 Comments

  • Agalyawamu says:

    AIDs and EBOLA were all experimentation and brought to Africa then Africa got the blame. God knows the hearts of people doing this…they will get their rewards accordingly.

  • cjnwogu says:

    What about the HIV/AIDS, could this have come into Africa out of the same experimentation, carelessness and unethical practices undermining known conventions????? This story should not be wished away by a mere wave of hands, African governments need to investigate the authenticity of this story. Sooner or very soon the truths are really going to be made known and African governments will need to set controls and monitor to avoid future unknown disease outbreaks crippling their economies. No matter how well placed, rich or poor you are nobody is any longer safe in the present day World of uncontrolled experimentations and maneuvers.

  • abankula says:

    You need to read this guy’s CV published on the website of University of Illinois to know that he is not a charlatan. In my view, he knows his onions, as he has been involved in making international treaties on biological weapons. As an African, following closely the Ebola pandemic, I have no reason to doubt Boyle’s view. Even Africans in Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia have been protesting about the disease; that it could not be an African disease, but some horror planted in their midst by some foreigners. Mr. Awoyokun will need to consider why Pentagon and even the Chinese Military have been involved in the search and funding for Ebola cure, if they are not privy about what we do not know and what Boyle knows.

  • damola awoyokun says:

    Is Boyle a professor of epidemiology, microbiology or virology? he is a professor of international law. why is our own minds receptive to conspiracies and superstitions from charlatans from T.B Joshua to Boyle and not to facts?

  • What do you think?

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.